바로가기 메뉴
본문 바로가기
푸터 바로가기
TOP

Clinical evaluation of the accuracy of two face scanners with different scanning technologies

Clinical evaluation of the accuracy of two face scanners with different scanning technologies

Author

Murali Srinivasan, Claudio Rodrigues Leles, Florentin Berisha, Innocenzo Bronzino, Yasmin Milhomens, Sung-Jin Kim, Koungjin Park, Jae-Hyun Lee

Journal

J Dent

Year

2025

Srinivasan M, Leles CR, Berisha F, Bronzino I, Milhomens Y, Kim SJ, Park K, Lee JH* (Corresponding author). Clinical evaluation of the accuracy of two face scanners with different scanning technologies. J Dent. 2024 Dec 30:105553. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105553.

 

Abstract:

  • Objectives: This study compared the clinical accuracy of two different stationary face scanners, employing progressive capture and multi-view simultaneous capture scanning technologies.
  • Methods: Forty dentate volunteers participated in the study. Soft tissue landmarks were marked with a pen on the participants’ faces to measure the distances between them. Clinical measurements were manually obtained using a digital vernier caliper by two independent examiners. The participants’ faces were then scanned using one of two stationary face scanners: Obiscanner (Obi), which employs progressive capture technology requiring the subject’s head to rotate during image acquisition, or RAYFace (RAY), which utilizes multiple cameras to simultaneously capture a complete 3D image. The scans were imported into mesh-processing software, and digital measurements were taken by the same examiners. Data analysis included pairwise comparison tests and the calculation of the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC; α=0.05).
  • Results: Digital measurements were significantly longer than clinical measurements across all measured distances (p<0.001). Comparisons between the scanners revealed that vertical measurements using RAY exhibited greater percentage differences compared to those using Obi (p<0.05), while horizontal measurements were more variable with Obi than those obtained using RAY (p<0.05). Intra-examiner differences were significant for both methods (p<0.001), although inter-examiner differences were only significant for clinical measurements (p<0.001), not for digital measurements (p>0.05). Inter-examiner reliability for digital measurements was high (ICC≥0.99).
  • Conclusions: Significant differences were observed in the accuracy of the two stationary face scanners using progressive capture and multi-view simultaneous capture scanning technologies, with each device demonstrating specific strengths and limitations.
  • Clinical Significance: Although face scanners offer relatively high accuracy and consistency, particularly across different acquisition technologies, careful consideration of their performance characteristics is essential for optimizing accuracy in facial measurements.
  • Keywords: 3D Facial scan; CAD-CAM; Geriatric dentistry; Removable prosthodontics; Stationary face scanners